Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Faul's False Ears




Faul's false ears are considered by some to be the "smoking gun" that Paul McCartney was replaced. Let's take a look at what Paul McCartney's ears looked like first. As you can see, the earlobes were attached.






Now, let us take a look at some pictures of Faul's ears. Sometimes they look unattached, sometimes they look just plain fake.


Paul McCartney & Wings - Mull of Kintyre [live '1977]

Here are some more pictures showing obvious anatomical differences between the ears of Faul and Paul.





Now comparing the ears side by side:






I don't know how much plainer it can be that those are not the same ears. This was also the conclusion of two Italian forensics experts, Francesco Gavazzeni and Carlesi Gabriella in an article in the August 2009 Italian issue of WIRED magazine. This is a machine translation of part of the article:
...Technically called trago [tragus: http://www.westone.com/content/234.html]. All we have two, one by ear, but the characteristics are different for every human being. ‘In Germany, a recognition procedure craniometric, identification of the right ear is even tantamount to fingerprint, ie the collection of fingerprints,’ recalls Carlesi. But what is trago? It is the small cartilage covered with skin that overhangs the entrance to the ear and ear canal, like the whole ear, cannot be changed surgically. How then to explain the differences between the right ear of Paul McCartney in a previous snapshot to 1966 and probably a built in the late nineties? It is not only to betray trago a different conformation as well as other parts, just above the ear canal entrance, measurements and dell'antelice propeller. Things that ordinary mortals might seem irrelevant or unclear, but instead, every day, allowing the experts to locate and identify persons, bodies, photographs...
"Ask Who Was the 'Beatle,'" http://tinyurl.com/mw83db

This is an interesting picture. It seems that "Paul" on the right has had some Photoshop work done on his ear. Maybe it was for the benefit of people who have noticed differences in the ears? An attempt to change history maybe?






EDIT: Here is some information on using ear biometrics to identify people. In this case, the different ears can be used to detect the imposter.


...When employing face or lip as a biometric, changing of their appearance with the expression of the subject creates problem but in case of ear the shape and appearance is fixed.
...Identification by ear biometrics is promising because it is passive like face recognition, but instead of the difficulties to extract face biometrics, it uses robust and simply extracted biometrics like those in fingerprinting. The ear is a unique feature of human beings. Even the ears of “identical twins” differ in some respects. There are persons in crime laboratories that assume that the human external ear characteristics are unique to each individual and unchanging during the lifetime of an adult...
Person Identification Using Ear Biometrics
Md. Mahbubur Rahman, Md. Rashedul Islam, Nazmul Islam Bhuiyan, Bulbul Ahmed, Md. Aminul Islamhttp://www.journal.au.edu/ijcim/2007/may07/IJCIMvol15no2_article1.pdf

... All we have two, one by ear, but the characteristics are different for every human being. "In Germany, a recognition procedure craniometrico, identification of the right ear even tantamount to fingerprint, ie the collection of fingerprints," recalls Carlesi. But what trago? It is the small cartilage covered with skin that overhangs the entrance to the ear and ear canal, like the whole ear, not be changed surgically ...
ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
Fabio Gigante Andriola and Alessandra | 15 July 2009http://tinyurl.com/mw83db
EDIT: A member of Macca's Fun House - a forum with the express purpose of suppressing the Truth about PID - is trying to use this doctored photo as "proof" that Paul's and Faul's ears are "the same." It has been sufficiently proven that the ears were markedly different.




The Luciferian Deception

ALIEN INVASION:
Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth


31 comments:

  1. What a truly excellent post ! You have really hit the nail on the head !!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. A Very Good Analysis.
    The "Queen" is exposed.
    Now and Forever

    Sun King

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sun King,

    Thank you for your comment. It's an honor, Sir.

    The Truth will be exposed!

    Tina

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Eyes and Ears have it as the saying goes and that alone would be enough to establish these are two distinct and different people. Also the one thing that never changes in a face is the lines of symmetery. If you are 25 or 75 they remain consistent unless surgically altered which would be quite involved : not common cosmetic procedures.
    The jaw width is inconsistent, the nose length and angle are inconsistent, the head shape is inconsistent, and the face length is inconsistent.

    ReplyDelete
  5. your work is perfect
    thank you tina
    my uncle,an english teacher at the time,told me in the late 70's about this "legend" concerning paul being replaced. I was young, and i didn't even understand what he was meaning!
    thanks to your work, things are clear now.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Okay, I found it. The photo below me is officially without a doubt the WORST set of Faul's prosthetic ears of all time. You truly have to see this to believe it, Plastic Macca. Not only do they look hopelessly fake but they DON'T EVEN HAVE HOLES. It's a solid hunk of plastic. Please put this photo on your blog or on your photobucket because it's...unbelievable.

    To view it simply copy and paste into your web address bar to view (don't google it, because it doesn't work that way). Please let me know what you think!

    http://cgi.ebay.com/VINTAGE-PAUL-MCCARTNEY-CANDID-PHOTO-BEATLES-/110656102669?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item19c39e210d

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anonymous--I just followed your link, and it still takes people to the ebay page on which pictures of Paul and the other Beatles are being sold, but I couldn't find the one you were referring to, but I did find this one:

      http://www.ebay.com/itm/ORIGINAL-FAN-PHOTOGRAPHER-PHOTO-Paul-McCartney-The-Beatles-RARE-ONE-OFF-ORIGINAL/282150202182?_trksid=p2047675.c100011.m1850&_trkparms=aid%3D222007%26algo%3DSIC.MBE%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D38619%26meid%3Ddb1940cd65ec4fe0815d235969ccdff7%26pid%3D100011%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D5%26sd%3D110656102669

      That was taken in 1981--think it's the real Paul? No way! It doesn't fool me in the least and even without my knowing the date on which it was taken! I did find them selling this one, though, and I am so tempted to buy it:

      http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Paul-McCartney-Publicity-Color-Photo/222223197912?_trksid=p2047675.c100011.m1850&_trkparms=aid%3D222007%26algo%3DSIC.MBE%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D38619%26meid%3Ddb1940cd65ec4fe0815d235969ccdff7%26pid%3D100011%26rk%3D2%26rkt%3D5%26sd%3D110656102669

      The real Paul was just way too adorable for words! :)

      Delete
    2. Everyone knows who "Doctor Robert" is, right? Not a drug dealer (as widely supposed), but a renowned PLASTIC SURGEON specializing in the PROSTHETIC EAR.

      Also, is there a was to be alerted via e-mail when these posts are added to or updated? Having just discovered this site, I'm adding posts!

      Delete
  7. ^ Thank you for sending that picture of Faul's fake ear. It looks like his earlobe has been gnawed off by a rabid dog. I posted it to the PID Miss Him forum & the Doppelganger forum. Good stuff. Keep it coming! :)

    Tina

    ReplyDelete
  8. coo, the pics are great

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am really concerned, why would his parents and the other beatles keep up the lie? Didn't they care about Paul at all? I mean they MUST have noticed it wasn't the same person. Hw could they just phase him out and not tell anyone, I am so confused. I guess I need more answers, I really need to know why they keept the charade up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. >AnonymousDecember 30, 2011 8:56 PM

      >I am really concerned, why would his parents and the other beatles keep up the lie? Didn't >they care about Paul at all? I mean they MUST have noticed it wasn't the same person. Hw >could they just phase him out and not tell anyone, I am so confused. I guess I need more >answers, I really need to know why they keept the charade up.

      Google thebeatlesneverexisted messageboard. They with pictures too, present evidence that all the other Beatles had doppelgangers too, and the doubles of Paul appeared indistintinctly in recordings, tours, etc. so PiD would be a wrong theory, because there never was a PWM. I've seen pictures of "Pauls" of all sizes, heights and musculatures and weird pictures of several Ringos with different neck lenghts.

      Delete
    2. Perhaps 'they' convinced the family Paul died in an accident (I think he was killed). Perhaps they were told their royalties would be less if the public knew Paul was dead. They may have been told they would be given a large sum of money and continuing royalties from the new Paul's music.

      Delete
    3. Hi Carlos--I just found thebeatlesneverexisted.com message board, and looked at many of their photo comparisons of Paul. For me, recognizing Paul has to do with his eyes mainly, coupled with his other features. If I can see his eyes Ive been growing far more confident that I can recognize him--the real him.

      I have to disagree with many of the comparisons made of his pictures, and those of 'f'aul with Paul, on that message board, because, at times, I'm so positive that they confuse Paul with Paul, claiming it's a comparison of Paul with 'f'aul. In some pictures they've labeled as being 'f'aul, or even a doppelganger of Paul, or a 'stand-in' look-a-like of Paul, they are actually misidentifying Paul as not being himself. I know it's tough when photos vary so greatly due to position of the person, their varying ages, the lighting differences, hair cut differences, width of smiles, etc., but just as many a mother can easily recognize her own son from among many imposters, it's becoming more that way for me--I can more often than not pick the real Paul's photo out from among fakes by this time fairly easily, and the same standard applies--like a mother picking her own son out of a line-up filled with imposters of him, so to speak.

      It's primarily because of his eyes--there is something in his eyes that's missing from the eyes of his 'stand-in's', and that especially applies to the 'f'aul we all know and dislike, who is still out there pretending he's Paul, and raking in the money due to Paul's estate, all thanks to Paul's talent, and he's spending that money that is rightfully Paul's legacy, that is owed to Paul's off-spring, and family.

      Here's a photo of the real Paul, and I've been wanting to point this out--he did hold his cigarette in his right hand at times, even though he said since he was left handed he did 'everything' left handed--this is only one photo that shows him holding that cigarette in his right hand:

      http://66.media.tumblr.com/f0e56b8864259a470085f9b67d0492b4/tumblr_mjb6urLxvZ1rmtmp0o6_500.jpg

      It's no big deal, since even though I'm right handed there are things that I automatically do with my left hand without even thinking about it. If Paul was ambidextrous though, I think he simply would have said as much--why hide it? I'd be thrilled if I could use both hands equally! :)




      Delete
  10. The family & friends may have been bribed &/or threatened to keep silent. Heather Mills almost spilled the beans (we think), but she got death threats, so clammed up.

    http://plasticmacca.blogspot.com/2009/09/what-does-heather-mills-know.html

    ReplyDelete
  11. I created a fade between two of the images above (locking the retina, chin, and ears) and the facial features don't blend proportionately IMHO...especially the nose which simply isn't the same structure...and the ear characteristics differ as well...

    http://i45.tinypic.com/2pr65ut.gif

    He's a fairly good double, I'll give him that, but certainly not 100%.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Culd you publish an overlay photo with faul and paul? Very plausible theory about Faul. Nothing surprises me anymore. Good work, please keep it up.Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Cud you publish an overlay photo with Faul and Paul. Very interesting stuff. Thanks for the good work. Nothing surprises me anymore. Wish I had a clone to do my housework!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Fascinating stuff. Cud you publish an overlay photo with Faul and Paul?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hi again, please watch this video of a post Beatles song, here at 0:49 you can see a glued ear and if you pause it, obvious signs of multiple plastic surgeries (around 0:49 too)

    http://youtu.be/IrthE_waCV8

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In this particular video I alerted to, http://youtu.be/IrthE_waCV8 , I'm sure now that it's just a trick of light and a strand of loose hair. But the signs and marks of plastic surgeries are real and evident. (they wouldn't do a sloppy work and give him latex ears IMO)

      Delete
  16. Watch George Harrison's last testament. It is on Netflix and I am sure you can find it other places as well. It has a lot of answers and I believe it to be clear that the Paul that claims to be Paul is indeed not the original. The truth is not only apparent in the facts, The spirit of Paul is just not alive in Faul. Instead of abandoning the remaining Beatles, let us understand the grace they carried Paul on in music and art.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "The Last Testament of George Harrison" is complete disinfo rubbish! It is based on the 60IF document, which has many problems with it. One day, I will do an expose on the Last Testament, which for starters, was not George Harrison! It is just another example how well-funded projects can Faulsify reality. Oh well. At least, it shows that Paul was replaced, even if the under-lying story is BS & meant to divert people from the Truth.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Tina, since the photo http://cgi.ebay.com/VINTAGE-PAUL-MCCARTNEY-CANDID-PHOTO-BEATLES-/110656102669?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item19c39e210d is now missing (sold) and you didn't put a link to where you'd reposted it -- thank you for saving it -- can you provide the link to it? It was on the forum, you said.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Unbelievably true! Too crazy of a "story" to just make up. The facts are in their music, album covers, Paul and fauls ears, and the length of Paul and fauls head. Too creepy! But George did give thanks to Faul for helping the beatles continue on :) so I guess we should as well, but it did not and does not give Faul the right to continue to stay in the lime light as Paul. Paul should have been put to rest when the beatles, the true beatles, were put to rest.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Well whoever Faul is, he did a bloody good job with the album Ram. I think I prefer Faul.

    ReplyDelete
  21. i want to share something that i think nobody has ever seen, is a video were you can see that his ear is completely out of its place, even though im a big fan of macca, i found this really interesting. Go to the minute 26:30, is only for a few seconds. The footage is from the 75, and i wonder why does he have fake ears like 11 years after he was allegedly replaced. Anyway, i dont think he was replaced but surely something strange happened. here is the link(i found this same footage in hd but i couldnt find it again):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIuPBEMQJjE

    ReplyDelete
  22. Having only been born in 1977, I grew up with Faul and always saw him as the real McCartney. I wondered what all the fuss was about, as, having met him, I thought he was a real wanker, and a not very talented musician. Everybody put his subsequent music failure down to it having been the Lennon/McCartney combination that made the magic, but somehow Lennon continued to make meaningful music while McCartney spewed out over-synthesised crap. But, now that I have seen the great switcheroo, I understand Beatlemania and the warmth in the hearts of fans worldwide for JPM, that Faul has ridden off for nearly 50 years. JPM was a true talent, and a warm, bubbly kind-hearted man that spread love and light wherever he went. Faul is a megolomaniac and egotist...I suppose his vanity being the result of pulling off the world's biggest con for this long. I never did understand the trashing of Heather Mill's. She went from being the tabloids' sweetheart to a gold-digging whore overnight. Now I recognise it as another Rupert Murdoch mind-control campaign. I originally put it down to a nation protecting one of it's national treasures, Macca, but actually the stakes involved are much deeper and more sinister. Now that I have seen the real JPM, I feel such loss for the talent and loving soul the world lost in 1966. It would have been better to reveal his death and let him live forever on in the hearts of millions as he was, and not as the sadistic, no-talent tosser that we have to contend with today. RIP JPM

    ReplyDelete
  23. Well…….. there's only one thing to do. And that's get a DNA sample from your suspected imposter. He obviously won't submit voluntarily. Therefore, clandestine measure must be taken. We must brainstorm here. Best place could be in the potty. There was a murder suspect that was done in by collecting one of his cigarette butts and coffee cup. This must all be camera cachee'd, aussi, and it must be FUN !!! Or what's the point, nowhereman ?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Is there any way besides knowing this that he can be legally exposed? I mean eye color change, ears that do not match over time, and a skull that goes from being attractive I guess to long, and average looking. This is really rotten.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for your comments. They will appear once they have been approved.